Five Year Mission
After a very long wait, Year 5 results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe have been released. We can test Theory's predictions with the data:
$\Omega$b is the proportion of baryonic matter-the protons, neutrons and electrons that humans are made of.
$\Omega$b = 4.6 +/- 0.2% (Prediction = 4.507034%)
$\Omega$m is the proportion of other mass, the "dark" mass that surrounds the galaxies in haloes and sheets between them.
$\Omega$m = 23.3 +/- 1.3% (Prediction = 23.87%)
The remainder was once called "dark energy," but bloggers like Steinn now say "No Clue." Hint: Look at the voids between sheets of galaxies. The vast majority of the Universe is contained within those voids, and they are far from empty.
Remainder = 72.1 +/- 1.5% (Prediction = 71.62%)
The 4.507034% prediction was published (after a very long wait) in the very short paper of 2004. This slide was prepared for the London conference a year ago. As we can see, predictions match the data for all three parameters within less than half a standard deviation. There are no error bars for a prediction, for mathematics allows us to calculate as many decimal places as we like. These results, and their close fit with the predictions, show why a better Theory of the Universe is slowly spreading.
5 Comments:
Excellent results, as expected. Like good professionals, we would like to falsify your Theory, but the data is not cooperating.
blabbady blah blah! What!?!
Please, dumb down your site for the rest of us. I really want to know why this high priced TAX paid stuff is worth the TAX money.
Come brainiac, WOW me!
-steve
For Kea: It may be a while before history realises that somebody predicted these numbers on the nose. Your post on this subject was good too.
For steve: All this can be predicted (with no tax money) from some very simple equations that a child could learn. The high-priced spacecraft just verifies the prediction. This work will lead to a better understanding our planet and even its long-term climate. It may lead to sources of energy that make nuclear power look crude. An upcoming post will review the history of this work.
I wonder, how can this work lead to better understanding of our planet`s long-term climate (ice ages and before them?).
-tapio
Ahhh, thanks dude. I really enjoy gleaning what I can. I dont pretend to play a braniac on TV, but I do LOVE science.
I like that you explained this to me...now, back to my bear skins and flint axes (spock)
-steve
PS
If your work can, as you say lead to a new means of energy production, then you sir are on the front lines against the islamic-terror war as much as any trooper. If you could get us to not have to give money to the killers in saudi arabia then you would be hailed a national hero!
Post a Comment
<< Home