### Einstein Continued: Real Equations

It is very, very exciting to have real equations on a blog! Previous bloggers relied on latex code without a decoder. Certain bloggers don't offer anything new except for snipes at each other. This site will strive to be both scientifically and technologically ahead.

Here, with acknowledgements to the supernova groups, is the updated Type Ia graph. Low redshifts increase linearly, indicating that the Universe expands and slows as Einstein-de Sitter predicted. Higher redshifts appear to curve upward, leading to speculation about repulsive energies. In fact, the data shows that c has decreased in exactly the amounts predicted.

Start with the expressions for c and R:

An object of redshift Z = 1.0 recedes at 60% of the present speed of light. That is only 42% of c at the time that light was emitted. The apparent z we measure is z = 0.57. For an absolute Z = 0.5, apparent z = 0.38 (horizontal arrows).

According to that other Einstein equation, energy output is also affected by change in c. For a supernova of Z = 1.0, energy output is doubled for a magnitude change of -2.5log(2) = -.75. For a supernova of Z = 0.5, magnitude change is -2.5log(1.5) = -.44 (vertical arrows).

Please observe the thick black prediction line. The line is difficult to see in the larger graph, because it is covered in data points. When the graph is blown up bigger, within error bars the prediction intercepts more than 90% of the points. Prediction fits the data precisely, without invisible energies.

It is possible to believe that a "dark energy" fills space and pushes the graph upward. Those of you with functional minds and critical thinking skills, which do you find reasonable? Hint: for some reason, others don't want you to see what is reasonable. The alternative to Theory is no theory at all, just an inferred fudge factor.

As you read this, more people are being exposed to real Theory with real equations. As was said in my very first posting, science is an adventure I am happy to be part of.

## 10 Comments:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Oh, Louise, it's great to actually see the improved graph and such beautiful blog formatting. How exciting! I think Peter Woit should apologise to Lubos for leaving his comment up and deleting ours, thereby perhaps removing Lubos' from it's original context.

Thanks Kea. Since you are working on some fascinating equations, I hope to raise the level of science we can present online.

5 long comments in a day by the same person is more than enough to trip the spam filter. I recommend slowing down until we get more comments from others.

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

testing if Latex works in comments $x^2$.

Here, with acknowledgements to the supernova groups, is the updated Type Ia graph.

burberry outletoakley vaultlongchamp bagspolo ralph shirtschristian louboutin shoeslouis vuitton outletray ban wayfarerlouis vuitton handbagsceline outletmichael kors outlettoms shoesadidas ultra boostcoach factory outlethermes handbagsvans shoes outletmichael kors handbagsgucci handbagscoach factory outletcoach factory outletadidas originals shoesgucci outletcheap oakleysburberry outlet onlinemichael kors outletadidas ultra boostoakley sunglassesjordan retrotoms outletoakley sunglassespolo ralph lauren outletlouis vuitton outletralph laurentrue religion jeansnike nfl jerseysjordanslouis vuitton handbagscoach factory outletjeremy scott shoeslouis vuitton handbagscheap oakley sunglasses2016.7.28haungqin

qzz0518

true religion jeansclippers jerseyslinks of londonsoccer jerseysuggs outletcanada goose outletmichael kors outletrockets jerseyscanada goose outletburberry outletzzzzz2018.8.8

air jordan 8ugg boots on sale 70% offoff white shoescheap nba jerseyspandoracanada goose jacketssalomom shoesugg bootskate spade outletchristian louboutin shoesThank you for sharing in this article, I can a lot and could also be a reference I hope to read the next your article update

Post a Comment

<< Home